I’ve to admit that till Saturday, Could 15, I felt nice admiration for Mr. Muñoz Molina; till he put his finger in my eye, together with me in that group of people that don’t suppose like him and who, subsequently, are in opposition to the common proper to well being, training, clear air, clear water, private security, equality earlier than the regulation, and so forth. That’s to say, and simplifying, that we aren’t on the left and that, moreover, we don’t imagine in that idiocy of the ethical superiority of the left.
That is what emerges from his article “You have to hide” (The nation, Could 15, 2021). I don’t disguise, I do not need a residence in Madrid, but when I resided there I might have voted – in line with the supply that was introduced to the voters – for Isabel Díaz Ayuso; in no case to those that, just lately and purely political sectarianismThey’ve criticized the awarding of the medal of town of Madrid to Andrés Trapiello, calling him “revisionist”; these for which Mr. Muñoz Molina requested the vote by signing a manifesto.
He begins his article with a quote from the French author Montaigne. Permit me to cite one other, extra modern, Gallic author, Jean François Revel, who, in his exalted work “The ineffective information”  tells us that “The to start with the forces that run the world is lies”.
Whereas I used to be pondering of writing this text, the one by my admired Jesús Alfaro Aguila-Actual (“The novelist defends himself” ), which I totally subscribe. Alfaro additionally speaks of the lie.
Ample on the thought, it may be mentioned with full certainty that what the novelist affirms about the truth that it’s a lie “Throughout all of the years that the precise wing has been governing in Madrid, its fixed effort has been to cut back the scope of public training, in addition to that of public well being”. It confuses, and I imagine at this level that in an approach, the general public assure of the rights to training and well being (which in Madrid take pleasure in no less than the identical assure as in the remainder of the Autonomous Communities) with the type of administration of mentioned Rights.
The article is the pure externalization of a foul loser tantrum, an mental tantrum, which tries to ridicule the voters of the winner, as a result of with literary finesse it involves say that there is no such thing as a extra idiot than a right-wing employee. How the voters of the Pink belt of Madrid can vote in favor of the dismantling of public training and well being?
The “particular beliefs that match on a sheet of paper”, Mr. Muñoz Molina, aren’t the heritage of the left.
 The version I learn is from 1989 (Circle of readers) and is prefaced by Mario Vargas Llosa, below the suggestive and popperiano Title of “The open Society and Its Enemies”. You can too see this text of our Nobel Prize, below the identical title because the prologue and revealed in The nation on February 9, 1989.https: //elpais.com/diario/1989/02/09/opinion/602982009_850215.html